Tuesday, July 12, 2011

JailbreakMe Site up for auction, bid now: Seller mystery - Phones Review

JailbreakMe Site up for auction, bid now: Seller mystery » Phone Reviews .wp-polls .pollbar {margin: 1px;font-size: 6px;line-height: 8px;height: 8px;background-image: url('http://static.phonesreview.co.uk/js/images/default/pollbg.gif');border: 1px solid #c8c8c8;} All NewsiPhoneBlackBerryAndroidHTCLGMotorolaSamsungSony EricssonNokiaVideo JailbreakMe Site up for auction, bid now: Seller mysteryUnder: Phone Business & Stocks
Date: July 4th, 2011

Anyone fancy buying the JailbreakMe.com domain name, this domain name is up for sale with the current bid being at only £1,555. So far only 33 bids have been placed, the certified appraised value was listed at only $316.50, the listing will end on 2011/07/16 12:00:00 AM (PDT).

If you visit GoDaddy.com you will see the domain up for sale, the auction is open to anyone. JailBreakMe domain popularity (Alexa Ranking) has a 6/10 (Rank of 39,063), the link popularity is as follows: Incoming Google Links: 360 Incoming Yahoo! Links: 12,783 Google Search Saturation: 5 Yahoo! Search Saturation: 0.

We cannot understand why JailbreakMe.com is up for sale, now if you visit 9to5Mac they report that @comex, a certain member of the Dev-team has been working on the iPad 2 jailbreak, apparently the jailbreak will use some sort of PDF exploit via jailbreakme.com and will support iOS 4.2.1-4.3.3, but a thanks to jailbreak beta testers leaked the exploit online. According to the source above this version of the JailbreakMe 3.0 exploit has not been confirmed by the Dev-Team or @Comex himself, how does this now stand if JailBreakMe.com domain is up for sale?

The question we would like to know is, “Who is selling the JailBrakMe.com domain?” We have tried to find who is selling it and we are still coming up with nothing, it does not tell you the sellers name on GoDaddy.com, this still remains a mystery.

It was thought that Comex was the owner, but iDB has updated its site saying Comex confirms he does NOT own the domain. Does this mean that original creator Nicholas Penree still owns the website?

We cannot understand why JailbreakMe.com is up for sale, we will keep everyone posted about this and updates will follow as soon as we get to the bottom of it.

If anyone knows who the seller of JailBrealMe is please do use the commenting area provided below and let us know, the site still shows a lot of source coding and this has been like this for a few weeks now.

What we do know: Comex’s JailBreakMe 3.0 for iPad 2 jailbreak was leaked recently. The PDF based exploit was leaked and publicly posted online, It now shows that the iPad 2 jailbreak leak did indeed get unfolded but most of the leaked files have been removed. iDB has the real story covering the iPad 2 Jailbreak Leak, let us know what your opinions are.

 

Follow Phones Review on Facebook and Twitter.
Read More About:

Sign up to the Phones Review Newsletter (free) for updates and news CLICK HERE

Related NewsiPad 2 Jailbreak Releasing Soon, Comex JailbreakMe HintJailbreakMe PDF Sign Surely Suggest Unlock iPad 2JailbreakMe 3.0 (Saffron) live, jailbreaks all iDevices & iPad 2 on iOS 4.3.3JailbreakMe We’ll Be Back Soon, Public Release Today: Update

http://www.facebook.com/people/Soso-Clark/100001347748027 Soso Clark

Guys its all comex thing leaking the jailbreak , selling the domain everything , he leaked the jailbreak he just want to make drama and he want everyone to talk about it like we are now talking about, he just want us to beg him to jailbreak our ipad’s

http://www.facebook.com/people/Soso-Clark/100001347748027 Soso Clark

Guys its all comex thing leaking the jailbreak , selling the domain everything , he leaked the jailbreak he just want to make drama and he want everyone to talk about it like we are now talking about, he just want us to beg him to jailbreak our ipad’s

  Twitter | Facebook | Email | Feed Subscribe To Phones Review Recommend on Google

A Stronger Net Security System Is Deployed - New York Times

“It won’t matter where you are in the world or who you are in the world, you’re going to be able to authenticate everyone and everything,” said Dan Kaminsky, an independent network security researcher who is one of the engineers involved in the project.

The Singapore event included an elaborate technical ceremony to create and then securely store numerical keys that will be kept in three hardened data centers there, in Zurich and in San Jose, Calif. The keys and data centers are working parts of a technology known as Secure DNS, or DNSSEC. DNS refers to the Domain Name System, which is a directory that connects names to numerical Internet addresses. Preliminary work on the security system had been going on for more than a year, but this was the first time the system went into operation, even though it is not quite complete.

The three centers are fortresses made up of five layers of physical, electronic and cryptographic security, making it virtually impossible to tamper with the system. Four layers are active now. The fifth, a physical barrier, is being built inside the data center.

The technology is viewed by many computer security specialists as a ray of hope amid the recent cascade of data thefts, attacks, disruptions and scandals, including break-ins at Citibank, Sony, Lockheed Martin, RSA Security and elsewhere. It allows users to communicate via the Internet with high confidence that the identity of the person or organization they are communicating with is not being spoofed or forged.

Internet engineers like Mr. Kaminsky want to counteract three major deficiencies in today’s Internet. There is no mechanism for ensuring trust, the quality of software is uneven, and it is difficult to track down bad actors.

One reason for these flaws is that from the 1960s through the 1980s the engineers who designed the network’s underlying technology were concerned about reliable, rather than secure, communications. That is starting to change with the introduction of Secure DNS by governments and other organizations.

The event in Singapore capped a process that began more than a year ago and is expected to be complete after 300 so-called top-level domains have been digitally signed, around the end of the year. Before the Singapore event, 70 countries had adopted the technology, and 14 more were added as part of the event. While large countries are generally doing the technical work to include their own domains in the system, the consortium of Internet security specialists is helping smaller countries and organizations with the process.

The United States government was initially divided over the technology. The Department of Homeland Security included the .gov domain early in 2009, while the Department of Commerce initially resisted including the .us domain because some large Internet corporations opposed the deployment of the technology, which is incompatible with some older security protocols.

Internet security specialists said the new security protocol would initially affect Web traffic and e-mail. Most users should be mostly protected by the end of the year, but the effectiveness for a user depends on the participation of the government, Internet providers and organizations and businesses visited online. Eventually the system is expected to have a broad effect on all kinds of communications, including voice calls that travel over the Internet, known as voice-over-Internet protocol.

“In the very long term it will be voice-over-I.P. that will benefit the most,” said Bill Woodcock, research director at the Packet Clearing House, a group based in Berkeley, Calif., that is assisting Icann, the Internet governance organization, in deploying Secure DNS.

Secure DNS makes it possible to make phone calls over the Internet secure from eavesdropping and other kinds of snooping, he said.

Security specialists are hopeful that the new Secure DNS system will enable a global authentication scheme that will be more impenetrable and less expensive than an earlier system of commercial digital certificates that proved vulnerable in a series of prominent compromises.

The first notable case of a compromise of the digital certificates — electronic documents that establish a user’s credentials in business or other transactions on the Web — occurred a decade ago when VeriSign, a prominent vendor of the certificates, mistakenly issued two of them to a person who falsely claimed to represent Microsoft.

Last year, the authors of the Stuxnet computer worm that was used to attack the Iranian uranium processing facility at Natanz were able to steal authentic digital certificates from Taiwanese technology companies. The certificates were used to help the worm evade digital defenses intended to block malware.

In March, Comodo, a firm that markets digital certificates, said it had been attacked by a hacker based in Iran who was trying to use the stolen documents to masquerade as companies like Google, Microsoft, Skype and Yahoo.

“At some point the trust gets diluted, and it’s just not as good as it used to be,” said Rick Lamb, the manager of Icann’s Secure DNS program.

The deployment of Secure DNS will significantly lower the cost of adding a layer of security, making it more likely that services built on the technology will be widely available, according to computer network security specialists. It will also potentially serve as a foundation technology for an ambitious United States government effort begun this spring to create a system to ensure “trusted identities” in cyberspace.


View the original article here

STRATO and Open-Xchange Form Partnership for Cloud Application Business - TMC Net


STRATO and Open-Xchange Form Partnership for Cloud Application Business
TMC Net
Earlier this year, Open-Xchange formed a partnership with Host Europe Group, a leading provider of domain name registration and Web hosting in the UK and Germany, to enable Host Europe Group to bring free Open-Xchange Webmail and Personal Information ...


View the original article here

Facebook, Skype, and Microsoft's savvy investment - CNET

Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, left, and Skype's Tony Bates announce a deal to include Skype's video conferencing into Facebook's social network.

(Credit: James Martin/CNET)

Just after Microsoft Chief Executive Officer Steve Ballmer announced plans in May to buy Skype, he and Skype Chief Executive Officer Tony Bates had one more order of business.

"The day we announced, we definitely came to see Mark," Bates said, talking of Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg, at a press conference today announcing Facebook's plans to bake Skype's video conferencing technology into its social network. "It was for both of us, Steve and I, the most important strategic relationship."

As Google grows ever more powerful in techdom, and Microsoft's influence slips, the Redmond software giant is building closer and closer ties to Facebook. The Facebook-Skype deal today is more evidence that Microsoft and Facebook are in lockstep as they fight their mutual foe, Google. And it comes even while Microsoft awaits regulatory approval to conclude its Skype acquisition.

"We have a really good relationship with Microsoft, where we work with them on a lot of different stuff," Zuckerberg said at the press conference announcing the new video-conferencing feature. That stuff includes advertising, where Microsoft provides all the search advertising to Facebook. It used to provide display advertising, too, but Facebook took over that task last year.

Microsoft has been criticized for its many missteps on the Internet, ranging from leisurely upgrades of Internet Explorer to being slow to understand the importance of search. But its relationship with Facebook is something Ballmer & Co. got right. Microsoft cemented its bond with Facebook in 2007, when it bought a 1.6 percent stake in the company for $240 million. Today, if reported valuations of Facebook are to be believed--online privately held stock marketplace SharesPost currently has an implied value for the company at $82.4 billion--that 1.6 percent is worth $1.3 billion.

But the Microsoft-Facebook relationship isn't really about savvy investment, of course. It's about fighting off Google. Microsoft's Facebook deals, and you can include the new video chat feature from Skype, are all aimed squarely at the search king. And just as the Web search giant has changed the market dynamics to undermine Microsoft's power--helping establish the Web, not the PC desktop, as the heart of computing--so too is Facebook challenging Google. Its service, with 750 million users worldwide, is becoming something of an alternative Internet, a place where computer users spend huge chunks of time and never touch a Google service.

In May, Microsoft began including recommendations from Facebook friends into its Bing search engine, elevating results that receive a "like" from someone in the searcher's network. That way, when people search for a coffee shop in Los Angeles, for example, a java stop that won Facebook praise from their friends will rate higher in their search results, as long as they are logged in, than other nearby locations.

The Microsoft-Facebook deals are creating services that Google has yet to match. Google has tried to add social networking to search, creating its +1 button to shower favor on a news article, a company, or even a search result. But its network isn't the equal of Facebook. So clicking the +1 button doesn't have the same impact as clicking a Facebook "like."

The new video chat feature unveiled today offers the potential to extend Skype to an ever wider audience. Facebook users can connect their accounts with Skype. If they chose to, it opens another outlet for the video-conferencing service. Microsoft has already talked about baking Skype into a host of products, everything from its Outlook e-mail software to its Xbox video game console. The new deal could conceivably allow video chats from a Skype customer through a Facebook account on a PC to a TV set where an Xbox user, also connected by Skype, is online.

That's why Google continues to innovate too. Its Google+ social network, launched to a limited number of users last week, is a direct threat to Facebook, offering features unavailable from its established rival. Google+ Circles is a far more convenient way to sort friends and acquaintances and send updates to specific groups than Facebook's friend set-up. And Google+ Hangouts was first to video chat, and allows users to connect with up to nine of their contacts. The new Facebook video chat service only allows one-to-one calling.

There's little doubt the battle will continue with both sides ratcheting up the pressure with new services and features. Standing next to Bates at the press conference today, Zuckerberg made that perfectly clear.

"We're in the process of figuring out what we want to do next," Zuckerberg said.


View the original article here

Deals of the Day: JP Morgan Calls Off the Debt Collectors - Wall Street Journal (blog)


Deals of the Day: JP Morgan Calls Off the Debt Collectors
Wall Street Journal (blog)
KKR is leading a buying group that is near a $1 billion plus deal to snap up Web hosting giant Go Daddy. [NY Post] Related: Last year, Go Daddy mysteriously scuttled a sale of the company even as buyers were willing to meet the company's $1.5 billion ...

and more »

View the original article here

StartSSL Suspends Certificate Services Following Security Breach - Web Host Industry Review


Web Host Industry Review

StartSSL Suspends Certificate Services Following Security Breach
Web Host Industry Review
(WEB HOST INDUSTRY REVIEW) -- Certificate authority StartSSL (www.startssl.com) experienced a security breach on June 15, the company said in an advisory posted on its website. Operated by Israel-based StartCom ...

and more »

View the original article here

Monday, July 11, 2011

Frontier Communications, Yahoo to co-brand email experience - BizReport


Frontier Communications, Yahoo to co-brand email experience
BizReport
Yahoo is the leading web-based email provider in the US. As most users know, once they log-in, they have access to a home page offering links to their email but also hosting links to news, entertainment, sports and weather information. ...


View the original article here